Hindutva crazies on dating of the rig veda row cannot be located for updating some values may have
They tell you what you need to prove for AIT to be wrong and when you prove that, they shift the goal post.
You go and get some people who were alive to testify. Then he shifts the goalpost and asks you to furnish a DNA report.
You produce that, it says the DNA report is right only 98%, 2% it is wrong. In the meanwhile, the irony is that your father is your father and you are running pillar to post to prove this.
You can take a stand, present the proof and ask the other guy to f..
In India however the horse was not present until the (proto-)Rigvedic people came to India, and brought the horse and chariot with them.
This happened after the Indus Valley Civilization because no horse remains have been found there or in India before the Rigvedic people brought the horse to India.
The latter is playing into the hands of the AIT-Nazis. If they say prove it right, we can retort it by saying "prove it wrong".
For the horse we just need an alternative narrative, and not heaps of evidence of horse bones.
Dear Karen, One thing I know about widowers, followed by two things I know about men.
Why we are so hung up on 'horse' wrt to AIT discussion. It's akin to someone asking -prove that your father is your father.
In your book, you said that if a guy isn’t seeing you more than once a week by the 3 months point, he probably isn’t interested in a serious relationship.
My question is this – does this apply to widowers as well or is it fair to give him a little more time and just get busy with other things so I don’t put pressure on him?