# 80 20 rule with dating

It’s only a “paradox” because our brains can’t handle the compounding power of exponents.

We expect probabilities to be linear and only consider the scenarios we’re involved in (both faulty assumptions, by the way).

This has been a fast and loosely defined in terms of subjective sexual market value (SMV) between men and women and the ratio of disparity between those valuations.

In intersexual terms, this 80/20 rule finds its roots in the economic theory known as the Pareto Principle: “80% of your sales come from 20% of your clients.” While I’m not sure the principle is directly translatable, it mirror the general rule of Hypergamy and women’s innate drive to optimize their sexual strategy with who they perceive as the top tier 20% (Alphas) men fucking the 80% lion’s share of women.

It is however important to keep in mind that the 80/20 rule as it applies to Hypergamy is often bastardized in its inverse.

The presumption goes that if 80% of women want to have sex with the top 20% of men it should necessarily mean that the top 20% of men fucking 80% of women.

Let’s see why the paradox happens and how it works.

for 23 you get: and With the exact formula, 366 people has a guaranteed collision: we multiply by

It’s only a “paradox” because our brains can’t handle the compounding power of exponents.We expect probabilities to be linear and only consider the scenarios we’re involved in (both faulty assumptions, by the way).This has been a fast and loosely defined in terms of subjective sexual market value (SMV) between men and women and the ratio of disparity between those valuations.In intersexual terms, this 80/20 rule finds its roots in the economic theory known as the Pareto Principle: “80% of your sales come from 20% of your clients.” While I’m not sure the principle is directly translatable, it mirror the general rule of Hypergamy and women’s innate drive to optimize their sexual strategy with who they perceive as the top tier 20% (Alphas) men fucking the 80% lion’s share of women.It is however important to keep in mind that the 80/20 rule as it applies to Hypergamy is often bastardized in its inverse.The presumption goes that if 80% of women want to have sex with the top 20% of men it should necessarily mean that the top 20% of men fucking 80% of women.

||

It’s only a “paradox” because our brains can’t handle the compounding power of exponents.

We expect probabilities to be linear and only consider the scenarios we’re involved in (both faulty assumptions, by the way).

This has been a fast and loosely defined in terms of subjective sexual market value (SMV) between men and women and the ratio of disparity between those valuations.

In intersexual terms, this 80/20 rule finds its roots in the economic theory known as the Pareto Principle: “80% of your sales come from 20% of your clients.” While I’m not sure the principle is directly translatable, it mirror the general rule of Hypergamy and women’s innate drive to optimize their sexual strategy with who they perceive as the top tier 20% (Alphas) men fucking the 80% lion’s share of women.

It is however important to keep in mind that the 80/20 rule as it applies to Hypergamy is often bastardized in its inverse.

The presumption goes that if 80% of women want to have sex with the top 20% of men it should necessarily mean that the top 20% of men fucking 80% of women.

Let’s see why the paradox happens and how it works.

for 23 you get: and With the exact formula, 366 people has a guaranteed collision: we multiply by $1 - 365/365 = 0$, which eliminates $p(\text)$ and makes $p(\text) = 1$.

- 365/365 = 0$, which eliminates$p(\text)$and makes$p(\text) = 1$. One of the foundational ideas of Red Pill awareness from the earliest PUA years has been the 80/20 concept – 80% of women want to have sex and / or pair off with the top 20% of men. Fw-300 #ya-qn-sort h2 /* Breadcrumb */ #ya-question-breadcrumb #ya-question-breadcrumb i #ya-question-breadcrumb a #bc .ya-q-full-text, .ya-q-text #ya-question-detail h1 html[lang="zh-Hant-TW"] .ya-q-full-text, html[lang="zh-Hant-TW"] .ya-q-text, html[lang="zh-Hant-HK"] .ya-q-full-text, html[lang="zh-Hant-HK"] .ya-q-text html[lang="zh-Hant-TW"] #ya-question-detail h1, html[lang="zh-Hant-HK"] #ya-question-detail h1 /* Trending Now */ /* Center Rail */ #ya-center-rail .profile-banner-default .ya-ba-title #Stencil . Bgc-lgr .tupwrap .comment-text /* Right Rail */ #Stencil . Fw-300 .qstn-title #ya-trending-questions-show-more, #ya-related-questions-show-more #ya-trending-questions-more, #ya-related-questions-more /* DMROS */ . With the approximation formula, 366 has a near-guarantee, but is not exactly 1: One of the foundational ideas of Red Pill awareness from the earliest PUA years has been the 80/20 concept – 80% of women want to have sex and / or pair off with the top 20% of men. Fw-300 #ya-qn-sort h2 /* Breadcrumb */ #ya-question-breadcrumb #ya-question-breadcrumb i #ya-question-breadcrumb a #bc .ya-q-full-text, .ya-q-text #ya-question-detail h1 html[lang="zh-Hant-TW"] .ya-q-full-text, html[lang="zh-Hant-TW"] .ya-q-text, html[lang="zh-Hant-HK"] .ya-q-full-text, html[lang="zh-Hant-HK"] .ya-q-text html[lang="zh-Hant-TW"] #ya-question-detail h1, html[lang="zh-Hant-HK"] #ya-question-detail h1 /* Trending Now */ /* Center Rail */ #ya-center-rail .profile-banner-default .ya-ba-title #Stencil . Bgc-lgr .tupwrap .comment-text /* Right Rail */ #Stencil . Fw-300 .qstn-title #ya-trending-questions-show-more, #ya-related-questions-show-more #ya-trending-questions-more, #ya-related-questions-more /* DMROS */ . With the approximation formula, 366 has a near-guarantee, but is not exactly 1:$1 - e^ \approx 1$. If you take$\sqrt$items (17% more if you want to be picky) then you have about a 50-50 chance of getting a match. If you plug in other numbers you can solve for other probabilities: Remember that m is the (it’s easy to get confused, I did it myself). || One of the foundational ideas of Red Pill awareness from the earliest PUA years has been the 80/20 concept – 80% of women want to have sex and / or pair off with the top 20% of men. Fw-300 #ya-qn-sort h2 /* Breadcrumb */ #ya-question-breadcrumb #ya-question-breadcrumb i #ya-question-breadcrumb a #bc .ya-q-full-text, .ya-q-text #ya-question-detail h1 html[lang="zh-Hant-TW"] .ya-q-full-text, html[lang="zh-Hant-TW"] .ya-q-text, html[lang="zh-Hant-HK"] .ya-q-full-text, html[lang="zh-Hant-HK"] .ya-q-text html[lang="zh-Hant-TW"] #ya-question-detail h1, html[lang="zh-Hant-HK"] #ya-question-detail h1 /* Trending Now */ /* Center Rail */ #ya-center-rail .profile-banner-default .ya-ba-title #Stencil . Bgc-lgr .tupwrap .comment-text /* Right Rail */ #Stencil . Fw-300 .qstn-title #ya-trending-questions-show-more, #ya-related-questions-show-more #ya-trending-questions-more, #ya-related-questions-more /* DMROS */ .With the approximation formula, 366 has a near-guarantee, but is not exactly 1:$1 - e^ \approx 1$. If you take$\sqrt$items (17% more if you want to be picky) then you have about a 50-50 chance of getting a match.If you plug in other numbers you can solve for other probabilities: Remember that m is the (it’s easy to get confused, I did it myself). - e^ \approx 1$ . If you take $\sqrt$ items (17% more if you want to be picky) then you have about a 50-50 chance of getting a match.

If you plug in other numbers you can solve for other probabilities: Remember that m is the (it’s easy to get confused, I did it myself).

The 80/20 rule is about thinking of your relationship in a particular way and managing expectations around it.

## One thought on “80 20 rule with dating”

1. Just register with our dating in Vadodara source and you are off to a great start.